![]() The software features filter resonance, VDA modulation, and master effects that have been powered up to a total of 18 systems. Numerous sounds available only from the M1, most notable the famous “M1 Piano” sound, were taken up by musicians and producers around the world, and are still in use today. As a pioneer of PCM tone generation, it was notable not just for the reality of its sound, but also for the distinctive resonance and tonal character that demonstrated the high level of Korg's voicing technology. Along with its innovative "workstation" concept, the M1's "AI" (Advanced Integrated) synthesis system used PCM waveforms and digital effects to deliver fully complete program and combination sounds. Then its perfect for you! For everyone else.these are overpriced by a long shot and Korg's support terrible.The first workstation synthesizer, released in 1988, which defined the sound of the late ’80s and early ’90s: M1. But honestly.after much ado about that.in the end, I don't think there is anything special about these software synths unless you specifically loved that particular hardware and you like the idea of having a software version. And Korg just kind of ticked me off they would not provide me an upgrade path when they combined the two products (digital and legacy) into one legacy edition with all of the products. But same thing.though they are faithful recreations.they are both easy dwarfed by so many other very fine software instruments. I would have at some point upgraded to the analog stuff.the MS-20.and the MonoPoly. On top of that, Korg has never provided me an upgrade/crossgrade path to the full legacy collection.I have asked them several times over the years and just got back a lame non-answer. They are old, dated sounds.and way overpriced for what they are. They are very faithful recreations of the original hardware, but I literally NEVER use them, for the same reason I sold my M1 like 20 years ago. I bought the Korg Legacy Digital collection years ago when it first came out. They are way overpriced in my opinion compared to other software synths that are out there. My suggestion about both the Roland and Korg software kits is just get these if you specially know you need or want those particular sounds from classic hardware. (The fact that Moog has four HUGE apps in iOS but hasn't really gone after the plugin market-even though everybody clones their stuff-might tell you something.) My only guess is that computer plugins don't bring in as much money. I have always found it bewildering that they had the new GUIs finished for all these years and didn't bother to transfer them to the Korg Collection. And when you buy one, you get a limited edition version within Gadget. In addition, all the synths in the original Korg Collection have had the improved GUis for many years for iOS. The only other major companies I can think of that have this large a presence on iOS are Steinberg, Moog, and maybe Fabfilter. it is also available for Mac (with NKS) and the Gadgets are available on the PC. It is kind of a DAW-type thing, but it is also instruments (Gadgets) that they sell you one by one. It's mainly used on iPads and iPhones, but it is one of the most popular music programs sold. They have created one of the most successful music software products in history-Korg Gadget. It's just that their software focus is iOS, not computer plugins. Click to expand.Yes, they have dropped the ball on computer plugins.īut I disagree about their being hardware and not software companies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |